top of page

Chiropractic Principles: Complementary and Alternative Healthcare; Integrative Medicine

  • Anthony Ciccarelli
  • Feb 29, 2016
  • 3 min read

Much of the healthcare community has labelled chiropractic to be a part of the filed of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) (1). A proportion of chiropractors may not appreciate this label as they feel it is a barrier to become fully integrated into mainstream healthcare (1). However others in the profession support its label by accepting and integrating both alternative and mainstream medical practices (1). Regardless of opinions, it is crucial for practicing chiropractors to understand the importance of interdisciplinary collaborative practice in order to deliver the best possible patient-centered care.

As defined, “Interprofessional Education (IPE) occurs when two or more professions learn with, from and about each other to improve collaboration and the quality of care” (2). Effective interprofessional education works to improve the quality of patient care and encourages professions to learn with, from and about each other while respecting the integrity and contribution of each profession (2). Ultimately, interprofessional education is implemented to promote interprofessional collaborative patient-centred practice. Patient-centred collaborative practice helps to “promote the active participation of each discipline in patient care” (2). It enhances patient and family-centred goals and provides mechanisms for continuous communication among caregivers (2). In the past, many healthcare practitioners worked independently of one another, including chiropractors. As current evidence now strongly suggests, the effectiveness of interdisciplinary collaborative practice is crucial for current chiropractors and those in training to develop stellar interdisciplinary communication skills (2). Chiropractic educational institutions need to identify the core competencies of knowledge, skills/behaviours and attitudes that should be taught and assessed for interprofessional collaborative patient centered practice (2). In North America, chiropractic education is generally not part of the university or college system (i.e. not having direct access to other health professions) and as such IPE infusion may be difficult. Although educational improvements have been made to enhance interprofessional collaboration, I feel as though additional opportunities need to be determined in order to further strengthen interprofessional education as part of their core curriculum as it is such an important aspect of patient care and interprofessional reliance.

The ultimate goal of public healthcare is to “ assure optimal conditions in which people can be healthy” (3). Traditionally, chiropractic care has focused on the individual patient or groups of patients. (3) Unlike the past, the chiropractic profession no longer has major external barriers that prevent participation in public health activities (3). Public health challenges us to focus on the health of global communities rather than independent healthcare providers. As the profession that offers conservative care for neuromusculokeletal and other health-related conditions, chiropractic is positioned to provide contributions to wellness and health promotion (1). However, without a stern effort in all areas of the profession (i.e. collaborative practice), improvements may not be made and opportunities may be lost (3).

As chiropractic care has becomes more accepted and integrated within healthcare, the profession also becomes more responsible for public health care issues. Chiropractors, by the very nature of their health practices and diagnostic skills, are the ideal candidate to promote healthy lifestyles and support major public health initiatives. Our involvement in public health will serve to improve the health status of our patients and the communities in which they live.

References:

1. Haldeman S. Principles and Practice of Chiropractic. 3rd edition. United States of America: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 2005.

2. Centre For The Advancement Of Interprofessional Education [Internet]. United Kingdom: caipe; 2002. Available from http://www.caipe.org. uk/about-us/defining-ipe/

3. Meeker W, Haldeman S. Chiropractic: a profession at the crossroads of mainstream and alternative medicine. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 216–227


Comments


Recent post

Follow Us

  • Google+ Long Shadow
  • YouTube Long Shadow
  • Twitter Long Shadow
  • Facebook Long Shadow
  • Pinterest Long Shadow

Search by Tags

CP Small Group Reflection- Should any of these activities not be permitted?

1. Has anyone seen a chiropractor that does pre-payment or blocked plans?

 

Group discussion:
 

As a group we do not think the profession should allow for blocked payment plans. We feel like it is a scam, is unethical and that it undermines the profession. We think that pre-payment options should be allowed on a patient by patient basis, and if they are discharged prior to completing the amount of treatments they paid for that the extra appointments should be credited to their account to be used at another time. 

 

Group discussion:

 

This form of payment was ok to us as a group. We did not see an issue with this form of payment but some people in our group, were unsure if they would implement this in their practice or not, but is something they would probably consider in the future. Especially if patients were asking about it as it is more convenient for the patient and front desk staff, especially if the patient comes in often.

 

 

                2. Open concept style of practice?

  • Definitely benefits to this, but also cons as well

  • Prevents individuals from discussing certain topics that they may not be comfortable with discussing in front of people

  • Can be beneficial because different patients get different treatments that these patients may not recognize our profession can help with. Example the one patient gets treated for headaches and the second patient didn’t realize we can help with these. This can promote your concept

  • This allows you to be pretty social but not seeing serious conditions

  • This makes us different from other healthcare practitioners and can further give us a negative name

 

Group discussion:

 

We did not think open concept styles of practice are appropriate. We are primary health care practitioners and some of the information patients share with us is sensitive, and therefore should be discussed in private. Furthermore, patients would be less inclined to share information with their practitioner if it was in an open concept room. We also feel that because our patients are paying for our services that they should have our undivided attention during their treatment time and that they should be our number one priority. This type of relationship is easier to maintain in a closed off space where the patient can have your undivided attention that is free from distractions or interruptions. However, we felt that an open concept style could be appropriate when passive care (ie. Modalities) is being done. 

bottom of page