top of page

Chiropractic Principles: Professionalism and Ethics

  • Anthony Ciccarelli
  • Nov 28, 2015
  • 3 min read

Professionalism can be described as the relationship through which a person who has a high level of expertise and discipline in a chosen field establishes trust with those of society (1). In the chiropractic profession, this includes both the relationship between the chiropractor and the patient. Professional identity is established from the developmental process in one’s chosen field that facilitates an understanding of one’s self (1). This would allow one to explain her or his role to others within and outside of the respective discipline.

Chiropractic is considered to be a honourable profession by much of society. With such a respective title comes great privilege and responsibility. Autonomy, the power of self-government, is an important privilege a profession may possess which gives the profession a great deal of authority (2). Professionals have the power make behavioural decisions simply based on the knowledge they have previously obtained. The ability to self- regulate is also an important privilege a profession can posses (2). Within a profession, its members are responsible to create and implement a code of ethics and various regulations (2). Similarly, in order to posses such power and influence comes a significant amount of responsibility, specifically with respect to the well being of the public (2). Defining oneself as a professional also entails acting in the patient’s best interest. For instance, at the heart of patient-centred care lies the patient-physician relationship. Built on values such as trust, empathy, respect and honesty, it is the foundation on which patient-centered care is established (2). If these values are not attained between the professional (i.e. clinician) and patient, pubic trust would be difficult to sustain.

The idea of public trust in the context of health care can be viewed by the quantity of confidence that is placed in the professional by the public population (2). It is in direct measure of the competence (i.e. skill and knowledge) displayed by the healthcare professional (2). Whether the healthcare professional is working in the best interest of the patient population establishes the basis of public trust, especially in the healthcare setting. Trust relationships are therefore characterised by one party (i.e. the public population) having positive expectations regarding both the competence of the professional and that they will work in their best interest (2).

Some people commonly use the terms professionalism and ethics interchangeably, however there are certain differences that do exist. Ethics can be understood as guidelines that are imposed on a particular set of individuals (i.e. professionals in a respective filed) (2). Ethics can be considered as principles that guide a professionals behaviours and interactions with colleagues and society itself (2). Generally, ethical principles explain what one cannot do and professionalism deals with what one should do (2). Likewise, a common misconception of the terms ethics and morals can also lead to confusion. In short, morals can be described as the beliefs of an individual or group as to what is right or wrong (2). Ethics are the guiding principles, which help the individual or group to decide what is good or bad (2). For example, pregnancy abortions are legal by law and therefore medically ethical, however many individuals in society find it personally immoral to have an abortion. Ethical and moral situations are encountered on a daily basis within the healthcare professions, including chiropractic. It is crucial to understand how to address such issues and more importantly, how to prevent them in order to maintain professionalism.

References

1. Brott, PE., Myers, JE. Development of professional school counsellor identity: A grounded theory. Professional School Counseling1999; 2(5): 339-341.

2. Haldeman S. Principles and Practice of Chiropractic. United States of America: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.; 2005.


Комментарии


Recent post

Follow Us

  • Google+ Long Shadow
  • YouTube Long Shadow
  • Twitter Long Shadow
  • Facebook Long Shadow
  • Pinterest Long Shadow

Search by Tags

CP Small Group Reflection- Should any of these activities not be permitted?

1. Has anyone seen a chiropractor that does pre-payment or blocked plans?

 

Group discussion:
 

As a group we do not think the profession should allow for blocked payment plans. We feel like it is a scam, is unethical and that it undermines the profession. We think that pre-payment options should be allowed on a patient by patient basis, and if they are discharged prior to completing the amount of treatments they paid for that the extra appointments should be credited to their account to be used at another time. 

 

Group discussion:

 

This form of payment was ok to us as a group. We did not see an issue with this form of payment but some people in our group, were unsure if they would implement this in their practice or not, but is something they would probably consider in the future. Especially if patients were asking about it as it is more convenient for the patient and front desk staff, especially if the patient comes in often.

 

 

                2. Open concept style of practice?

  • Definitely benefits to this, but also cons as well

  • Prevents individuals from discussing certain topics that they may not be comfortable with discussing in front of people

  • Can be beneficial because different patients get different treatments that these patients may not recognize our profession can help with. Example the one patient gets treated for headaches and the second patient didn’t realize we can help with these. This can promote your concept

  • This allows you to be pretty social but not seeing serious conditions

  • This makes us different from other healthcare practitioners and can further give us a negative name

 

Group discussion:

 

We did not think open concept styles of practice are appropriate. We are primary health care practitioners and some of the information patients share with us is sensitive, and therefore should be discussed in private. Furthermore, patients would be less inclined to share information with their practitioner if it was in an open concept room. We also feel that because our patients are paying for our services that they should have our undivided attention during their treatment time and that they should be our number one priority. This type of relationship is easier to maintain in a closed off space where the patient can have your undivided attention that is free from distractions or interruptions. However, we felt that an open concept style could be appropriate when passive care (ie. Modalities) is being done. 

bottom of page